TL;DR
Get business pricing on garage and car supplies
- Business-only prices and quantity discounts
- Tax-exempt purchasing
- Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
A 71-year-old man died after a Tesla struck him on I-80 in Vallejo early Thursday, the California Highway Patrol said. The driver told officers the vehicle was using Tesla’s Full Self-Driving system; CHP reviewed dashcam footage showing the car traveling about 70 mph and braking and steering before impact. Investigators have not said whether the driver or software initiated those actions.
A 71-year-old man died after a Tesla struck him on I-80 in Vallejo, California, early Thursday, the California Highway Patrol said. The Tesla’s 26-year-old driver told officers the car was operating in Full Self-Driving (FSD) mode, but CHP has not said whether the driver or the system made the braking and steering actions shown in footage before the collision.
CHP officers responded to a collision reported at about 2:35 a.m. and found the pedestrian severely injured. He was later pronounced dead. The man had been attempting to cross a section of the freeway, according to the account reported by ABC 7 News. The Tesla driver, who was from San Francisco, stayed at the scene, Futurism reported.
CHP said it reviewed dashcam footage showing the Tesla traveling at about 70 mph as the pedestrian entered the roadway from the right shoulder. In a statement quoted by ABC 7, the department said the footage showed the vehicle’s brakes being applied as it steered left in an effort to avoid the man. The car’s right front struck him despite those actions, CHP said.
The pedestrian was then struck by at least one other vehicle while lying on the highway, according to CHP. The department said no other vehicles stopped to cooperate with authorities. The available account does not identify those vehicles or establish the circumstances of the later impact.
Questions About Driver Supervision
The fatal collision places renewed attention on the distinction between Tesla’s Full Self-Driving name and the system’s required use under driver supervision. The driver told officers FSD was engaged, but that alone does not establish whether the technology caused or contributed to the crash. Nor does the footage description settle who operated the brakes or steering before impact.
Those details matter to the investigation and to public understanding of driver-assistance technology. CHP has stressed that the feature does not make a Tesla fully autonomous and that drivers remain responsible for safe operation. The crash also highlights the dangers of a pedestrian entering a high-speed freeway at night, while the available information does not establish how much warning the driver or vehicle had.
front and rear dash cam with GPS and night vision
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Recent I-80 Tesla Incidents
The report describes another recent Tesla crash on a California stretch of I-80. Last week, a Tesla reportedly operating in FSD struck a police cruiser stopped at the scene of an earlier collision. Two officers were sent to a hospital. The driver allegedly fell asleep, according to the source report; that allegation is separate from the circumstances of Thursday’s fatal crash.
CHP responded to the earlier incident by emphasizing the limits of the technology. The department said, “Despite its name, full self-driving is not fully autonomous.” It added that technology does not remove a driver’s responsibility to operate a vehicle safely. The current crash’s investigation will have to establish its own facts rather than rely on comparisons with other incidents.
Driver and System Actions Unclear
The report does not establish whether the driver or FSD applied the brakes and steered left, or how much time either had to react after the pedestrian entered the freeway. It also does not say whether the driver was looking at the road or describe any driver input before the collision.
CHP has not publicly identified the pedestrian in the source account, released a complete reconstruction, or explained the involvement of the other vehicle or vehicles that struck him afterward. The available details do not determine fault or establish that FSD caused the crash.
CHP Investigation Continues
CHP is investigating the collision. Further findings about the vehicle’s speed and movements, the driver’s actions, and the sequence of impacts may clarify what happened. The source report does not provide a timetable for the investigation, say whether charges are being considered, or indicate whether Tesla has commented.
Until investigators release more information, the confirmed account remains limited: a pedestrian died after being struck on I-80, the driver said FSD was engaged, and CHP’s review of dashcam footage showed braking and a leftward steering movement before impact.
Key Questions
Where and when did the crash happen?
It happened on I-80 in Vallejo, California, early Thursday. CHP responded to a collision reported at about 2:35 a.m.
Was Tesla Full Self-Driving engaged?
The driver told officers the Tesla was using Full Self-Driving. That is the driver’s account as reported by Futurism; the information provided does not include an independent confirmation from Tesla.
Did the software or the driver steer and brake?
That remains unclear. CHP said dashcam footage showed braking and a leftward steering movement, but the reported statement does not identify who or what initiated those actions.
Did another vehicle hit the pedestrian?
CHP said the pedestrian was struck by at least one other vehicle while lying on the highway. The source account says those vehicles did not stop to cooperate, and it gives no further details about them.
Source: fediverse
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
